A- de 2020
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto se pretende reabrir un debate que ya fue resuelto en el curso del trámite de admisibilidad de la demanda
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de adición o complementación del A351/20, por medio del cual se resolvió el recurso de súplica interpuesto contra auto que rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad contenida en el expediente D-13870.
Luego de analizar la petición consideró que la Corte que no es procedente y, por ello, decidió DENEGARLA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de adicion del auto No. 351 del treinta (30) de septiembre de dos veinte (2020), proferido por la Sala Plena, formulada por el ciudadano Jorge Luis Pabon Apicella.
- Segundo. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision al solicitante, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.